Through Michael Pahl's blog, I reached an article in Christianity Today that reviews one of the new Pope's books, Salt of the Earth: The Church at the End of the Millennium. On reading this review and the information it contains about Pope Benedict's views, he definitely leaves an impression as a critical thinker.
The first statements in the article that really caught me were these:
[Benedict (then Ratzinger)] refers, for instance, to "the canon of criticism"—women's ordination, contraception, celibacy, and the remarriage of divorced persons. On these issues, liberal reformers insist, the Catholic church must change if it is to reach the people of our time effectively. Here the cardinal becomes the skeptic. He notes an obvious factor that is often overlooked: "On these points Protestantism has taken the other path, and it is quite plain that it hasn't thereby solved the problem of being a Christian in today's world and that the problem of Christianity, the effort of being a Christian, remains just as dramatic as before." He sympathetically cites another theologian, Johannes Metz, who says that it was actually a good thing the Protestant experiment was made. Ratzinger observes, "It shows that being a Christian today does not stand or fall on these questions."
There is no denying that this is an astute observation and he has rightly driven at the heart of the matter: would a doctrinal shift edify the body of Christ and bring greater glory to God? I think it also bears on the question Ed Cook raises in his blog entry: Pope Benedict and Ecumenism.
I would like you to read the article so I will only draw out one more point that caught my eye -- the Pope's assessment of the future of Christianity in the new millennium:
When the cardinal turns his attention to the next millennium, now only months away, the tone is sober, even somber. He envisions a largely post-Christian world in which the church will be on the defensive, smaller in numbers, but, he hopes, more coherent and committed in its faith.
While I wonder if the Cardinal would have used the word the reviewer here chose, "defensive," apart from this, I find the assessment both accurate and also positive. If the Church becomes more coherent and more committed in its faith (and in so doing loses membership), it is because the Spirit is separating wheat from chaff. Shorn of its "part-time" Christians, the Church can stop force feeding those who don't want to eat and so move from a childish institution that shifts on the winds of popular culture to a more mature institution that grows rooted in our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. Indeed, this is what I have always admired about the Catholic Church, ie. its rootedness in tradition. The Catholic church deliberates change over millennia it seems and it patiently endures its own weaknesses and imperfections, all the while proclaiming the glory of God and preaching Christ crucified and resurrected without shame or dilution.
Check out more books by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger; this Pope is very well published! I may have to start ordering some of these books. Many of them look really interesting.